What is a major problem with the original Milgram study? Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical. What is the major flaw in the Asch conformity study? Asch ignored the importance of several factors influencing conformity- race, class, and gender.
What was a potential issue with how the debriefing was done in the Milgram obedience studies?
What was a potential issue with how the debriefing was done in the Milgram obedience studies? The Researchers did not tell participants that the learner had not actually been shocked.
Why was Milgram’s study criticized?
Few Participants Were Really Debriefed
Milgram’s experiments have long been the source of considerable criticism and controversy. From the get-go, the ethics of his experiments were highly dubious. Participants were subjected to significant psychological and emotional distress.
What were the limitations of the Milgram experiment?
” Long-term psychological harm to participants ” some participants reported psychological problems following the traumatic events of the study. There was also no period of debriefing following experiments, increasing the likelihood of psychological harm.
What did Milgram’s study teach us?
Milgram (1963) was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities, for example, Germans in WWII.
What was the conclusion of the Milgram experiment?
Stanley Milgram reached the conclusion that people would obey instructions from those who they saw as legitimate authority figures, even if the instructions they received were to do something to harm another person. From this, Milgram concluded that people were socialized to follow immoral or unlawful orders.
Is the Milgram study ethical?
ethical questions… … The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.
What are the four factors that influence obedience according to Milgram?
What was Milgram’s hypothesis?
The hypothesis tested in the Milgram experiment was that, under the right circumstances, people would follow the directions of an authority figure to the extent of harming or even killing other people.
What are limitations in experiments?
Limitations are parts of an experiment that keep the scientist from producing fair and reliable data. Even a very well planned out experimental procedure can lead to “mistakes” and produce less than perfect data.
How can Milgram’s study be applied to real life?
Milgram’s discovery about the unexpectedly powerful human tendency to obey authorities can be applied to real life in several different ways. First, it provides a reference point for certain phenomena that, on the face of it, strain our understanding-thereby, making them more plausible.
What was the significance of the Milgram experiment?
Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist best-remembered for his now infamous obedience experiments. His research demonstrated how far people are willing to go to obey authority. His experiments are also remembered for their ethical issues, which contributed to changes in how experiments can be performed today.
Did Milgram and Zimbardo know each other?
Milgram and Zimbardo knew each other in a professional capacity from their shared time in Yale’s Psychology Department in the late 1950s and early 1960s, Zimbardo said. … “A consequence of both studies is that these research can never be done again in an academic setting,” Zimbardo said.
Are there any similarities between the Milgram and the Zimbardo studies?
Similarities. In both studies the group of test subjects all were reported to have a change in personality. Both Zimbardo and Milgram found it difficult to end their studies even though it was clear it was causing harm to their volunteers. Both studies used authority figures.
Why was Zimbardo’s study unethical?
The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being ‘arrested’ at home.
What are the 4 elements of obedience?
Timing, motivation, criteria, and rate of reinforcement are the four elements that must be present for learning to take place. In fact, if behavior is changing these four elements are in place ” the trainer may or may not be aware that they’re in place, but they are.